ProofVault
Transaction Assurance Infrastructure

Built for merchants
who can't afford
weak records.

ProofVault captures policy acceptance, buyer confirmations, fulfillment records, and dispute-ready evidence across the full transaction lifecycle — before disputes begin.

The scale of the problem

$117B
Annual chargeback losses by 2028
71%
Filed as friendly fraud
30d
Visa dispute response window
Real cost per chargeback

Evidence framework built around dispute guidance from

StripeVisaMastercardPayPalSquareBraintreeAdyenWorldpay
$117B
Annual chargeback losses projected by 2028
Mastercard / LexisNexis
71%
Of disputes attributed to friendly fraud
Chargebacks911, 2024
30d
Visa's maximum formal dispute response window
Visa Core Rules
Real cost multiplier per chargeback
LexisNexis True Cost of Fraud
This is not a minor operational issue

Chargebacks are not a nuisance. They are a revenue, processor, and continuity risk.

Most merchants lose disputes not because the transaction was invalid, but because the record was incomplete, scattered, unclear, or assembled too late.

Revenue Reversal

When a cardholder files a dispute, the payment is typically reversed while the case is reviewed. The issuer, not the merchant, controls the decision.

Processor Standing

At elevated dispute rates, merchants risk losing their processor relationship entirely, not just individual transactions.

Dispute Fees

Beyond the reversal itself, every dispute incurs chargeback fees. Losing means paying the reversal, the fee, and losing the goods or services already delivered.

Tight Deadlines

Visa gives merchants 20 days to respond to a retrieval and 30 days to respond to a formal dispute. Evidence must be complete, formatted, and submitted within that window.

This is how the ecosystem actually works

Payment disputes do not operate on intuition or fairness. They operate on evidence, reason codes, deadlines, and issuer review.

01Merchant submits evidence
02Processor passes to issuer
03Issuer decides outcome
Stripe

The cardholder's bank reviews the evidence and decides the dispute outcome.

Square

Documentation is built around submitting relevant evidence to the customer's bank.

Mastercard

Merchants must respond within network timeframes and support the case with transaction-linked records.

The difference

The same dispute. Two completely different outcomes.

The only variable: whether the evidence was built into the transaction from the start.

Without transaction assurance
Dispute arrives. Scramble to find evidence.
Emails in one inbox, invoices in another, screenshots nowhere.
Processor response window: 20–30 days. Evidence assembly: days of work.
Incomplete record submitted. Missing fulfillment proof.
Bank rules in buyer's favor. Revenue reversed.
Dispute fee charged on top of the reversal.
Processor dispute rate inches toward their threshold.
No pattern visibility. Next dispute starts the same way.
With ProofVault
Transaction closes. Evidence record already built.
Policy acceptance, confirmations, and fulfillment logs captured at the time of sale.
Dispute arrives. Evidence package assembled in minutes, not days.
Processor-ready export: reason-code-informed, transaction-linked, chronological.
Submission made within hours of notification.
Stronger record means a stronger position in issuer review.
Pattern visibility across dispute history informs future transactions.
Each transaction strengthens the next.

The transaction record is either built in advance, or reconstructed under pressure. One of these approaches is materially stronger when it reaches an issuer's desk.

A different approach

Most merchants prepare after the dispute. ProofVault prepares before it.

A full-lifecycle assurance model across four operating stages, each strengthening the next.

01

Before Payment

Pre-transaction assurance

Harden the transaction before it becomes vulnerable. Policy visibility checks, invoice clarity review, missing-detail prompts, and acknowledgment architecture.

  • Invoice language review assistance
  • Agreement clarity review
  • Risk flags for ambiguous terms
  • Acknowledgment architecture
02

At Point of Sale

Transaction-moment capture

Capture the moment the transaction becomes defensible. Buyer confirmations, policy acceptance, timestamped transaction-linked evidence.

  • Buyer confirmation capture
  • Policy acceptance logging
  • Billing descriptor acknowledgment
  • Timestamped transaction records
03

After Fulfillment

Post-transaction preservation

Preserve the record with grace, not friction. Delivery confirmation, quality assurance surveys, issue interception, and communication trail preservation.

  • Delivery or completion confirmation
  • QA-style satisfaction surveys
  • Issue interception workflows
  • Communication trail preservation
04

If a Dispute Occurs

Dispute readiness and response

Respond with structure, not panic. Chronological evidence organization, processor-ready export packets, and reason-code-informed case structure.

  • Chronological evidence organization
  • Processor-ready export packets
  • Reason-code-informed structure
  • Faster submission readiness
The Evidence Model

The ProofVault 7-Pillar Evidence Framework

Built around the evidence patterns processors, networks, and issuing banks consistently rely on when reviewing disputes.

ProofVault is designed around the categories of proof that repeatedly appear in official processor and network guidance, including delivery confirmation, transaction-linked communication, policy acceptance, and usage evidence.

Pillar 01

Proof of Purchase Intent

Captures signs that the customer knowingly moved forward: purchase initiation records, checkout confirmations, timestamped submission data, and buyer confirmation steps.

Pillar 02

Proof of Policy Acceptance

Captures whether the customer had visibility into the terms governing the transaction, including refund policy acceptance, cancellation visibility, and terms acknowledgment with versioned records.

Pillar 03

Proof of Authorization

Captures signals that the transaction was authorized by the buyer, including transaction-linked confirmation events, authorization records, and recurring payment re-confirmation where relevant.

Pillar 04

Proof of Fulfillment

Captures whether the merchant actually provided what was purchased, including delivery confirmation, service completion acknowledgment, access records for digital delivery, and fulfillment timestamps.

Pillar 05

Proof of Customer Acknowledgment

Official customer touchpoints after fulfillment, including delivery confirmations, QA surveys, follow-up responses, and acknowledgments that the transaction met expectations.

Pillar 06

Proof of Remediation

Captures whether the merchant gave the customer a reasonable path to resolve concerns, including support responses, refund discussions, issue-resolution attempts, and remediation timelines.

Pillar 07: The Continuity Layer

Proof of Transaction History

The broader context around the buyer, including prior legitimate transactions, recurring customer history, and prior undisputed activity that strengthens continuity credibility.

Why it matters:

Context can strengthen credibility, especially where the transaction is part of an ongoing customer relationship rather than an isolated event.

One weak pillar can weaken the whole case

A signed agreement alone may not be enough if fulfillment is poorly documented. Delivery proof alone may not be enough if the refund policy was never clearly accepted.

ProofVault is designed to reduce that kind of weakness by helping merchants create a more balanced and complete record. Not just more documents, but more useful ones.

Explore the Full Evidence Framework
What banks and processors want

Banks don't reward good intentions. They look for structured, transaction-linked evidence.

ProofVault helps merchants capture and preserve the kinds of records official processor and network guidance consistently points to.

Relevant
Directly tied to the disputed transaction
Transaction-linked
Each record connects back to the specific payment
Chronological
Clear timeline from sale to dispute
Cleanly organized
Ready for review under pressure and tight deadlines

What processors consistently look for:

What was purchased and what the buyer agreed to
What policy was shown and accepted before payment
When payment was authorized by the buyer
Whether the goods or services were provided
Whether the customer acknowledged receipt or completion
Whether concerns were raised and addressed before escalation
Whether the evidence clearly ties to the specific transaction

Note: ProofVault does not provide legal advice. It helps merchants strengthen transaction clarity, evidence capture, customer acknowledgment, and dispute readiness through structured operational systems.

Built for serious operators

Designed for businesses that need more than generic fraud tools.

ProofVault supports service businesses, digital businesses, subscriptions, ecommerce brands, agencies, and multi-brand operators that need stronger records and better dispute readiness.

Industries served

Service businesses
Agencies
eCommerce brands
Subscription businesses
Digital product companies
Education providers
Coaching & consulting
Multi-brand operators
View all use cases
Enterprise

Enterprise capabilities

For organizations that need deeper automation, broader brand coverage, and more structured assurance infrastructure at scale.

Multi-brand support
Role-based access
Audit logs & retention
Processor-aware architecture
Executive reporting
Implementation support
Talk to Sales

Offer transaction assurance under your own brand.

ProofVault's agency model allows approved partners to deploy fully white-labeled assurance workflows, branded subdomains, and client-facing infrastructure, while reselling the platform under their own name.

Explore the Agency Program

The strongest dispute response
begins long before
the dispute exists.

Do not wait for a dispute to discover how weak your transaction record really is.

ProofVault helps businesses strengthen transactions before disputes begin.

Protect Your Transactions View Pricing

ProofVault does not provide legal advice. It helps merchants strengthen transaction clarity, evidence capture, customer acknowledgment, and dispute readiness through structured operational systems aligned with how payment disputes actually work.